The Institution · Est. 2023

Independent Intelligence for the Domain Asset Market.

MainSearches was established to bring institutional-grade rigor to a market historically defined by rumor, unverified claims, and speculative noise. We serve domain investors, brokers, legal practitioners, and corporate portfolio managers with research that meets the standards of financial journalism — not forum speculation.

480K+Sales Analyzed
312Restricted Resources
80+Jurisdictions Monitored
5Research Disciplines

Why We Exist

The domain aftermarket has matured into a multi-billion-dollar asset class, yet the information infrastructure supporting it remained fragmented, anecdotal, and frequently compromised by conflicts of interest. Sale figures circulate without verification. Valuation guidance is offered by parties with inventory to move. Regulatory analysis is produced by those selling compliance services.

MainSearches was founded on a simple conviction: that serious capital — whether deployed by individual professionals or institutional funds — deserves the same quality of market intelligence available in established asset classes. We built the research desk we wished existed.

Since our founding, we have grown from a private research circle into a recognized reference point for domain professionals, maintaining a strict separation between our editorial function and any commercial interest.

Our Editorial Standards

Every piece of intelligence published under the MainSearches name passes through a three-stage verification process. Sale figures are cross-referenced against marketplace disclosures and escrow records wherever possible. Regulatory analysis is reviewed by practicing IP counsel. Opinion is clearly and structurally separated from verified reporting.

I

Independence

We accept no compensation for coverage. No registry, marketplace, or broker influences our analysis. Editorial decisions are made exclusively by the research desk.

II

Verification

Quantitative claims carry source attribution. Where data cannot be independently verified, it is explicitly labeled — never presented as confirmed fact.

III

Discretion

Our members operate under confidentiality. Sources are protected, deal details are anonymized on request, and restricted materials are never redistributed.

What We Cover

Our research desk maintains continuous coverage across five disciplines: aftermarket sales data and valuation modeling; registry and registrar performance; ICANN policy and new gTLD developments; UDRP and trademark dispute jurisprudence; and portfolio strategy for institutional holders. Public analysis appears in our Open Access section; the complete archive is reserved for verified members of the Vault.

What We Do Not Cover

Editorial integrity requires boundaries as much as it requires coverage. We decline, as a matter of policy, to publish the following:

Paid placements or sponsored analysis in any form. Coverage cannot be purchased.
Valuation opinions on specific domains where we or our members hold a position.
Unverified sale claims that cannot be traced to a credible primary source.
Promotional content for registrars, marketplaces, or drop-catching services.
Speculative price targets presented as forecasts without disclosed methodology.

Corrections Policy

Our Commitment to Accuracy

When a factual error is identified — whether by our desk or by readers — we correct it promptly, visibly, and with a dated note explaining the change. We do not silently edit published figures. Corrections are logged and available on request at corrections@mainsearches.com. This register is maintained to preserve the integrity of our historical analysis.

Research Desk

How We Verify the Market.

Our credibility rests entirely on method. Below is a transparent account of how MainSearches collects, grades, and publishes market intelligence — so that members can evaluate not just our conclusions, but the foundation they rest on.

The Verification Pipeline

01

Collection

Sale data is aggregated from marketplace disclosures, escrow provider announcements, broker statements, and public filings. Each record is timestamped and attributed to its originating source at the moment of intake.

02

Cross-Reference

Figures reported from a single source are checked against independent channels. A sale confirmed by two or more unrelated sources is elevated in confidence; single-source figures remain flagged.

03

Grading & Labeling

Every quantitative figure is assigned a confidence label before publication. Readers can always see how strongly a claim is supported — we never blur this distinction.

04

Editorial Review

Legal and regulatory analysis is reviewed by practicing counsel. Quantitative models are checked for methodological soundness. Opinion pieces are reviewed for separation from fact-based reporting.

05

Correction & Revision

Post-publication errors are corrected through a visible, dated correction note. Revised datasets in the Vault are versioned so members can audit changes over time.

Confidence Labeling System

LabelMeaningTypical Use
VerifiedConfirmed by two or more independent sources or primary documentation.Major sales, regulatory filings, official registry disclosures.
ReportedStated by a credible single source; not independently confirmed.Broker-announced sales, private treaty figures.
EstimatedDerived from our models or extrapolation; clearly marked as opinion.Valuation ranges, market-size projections.

Data Handling & Retention

Proprietary datasets are maintained under access controls and versioned continuously. Member-facing materials are distributed under confidentiality expectations. We retain raw research data indefinitely to support longitudinal analysis, while personal inquiry data is governed by our Privacy Policy.

Artificial Intelligence Policy

Generative AI may assist in drafting and formatting under direct human supervision, but it never originates factual claims, figures, or legal analysis. All substantive content is researched, written, and verified by the human desk. We also maintain a position against the unauthorized scraping of our content for third-party model training, reflected in our technical and legal safeguards.

The Desk

Editorial Team & Advisory Board

Our contributors combine decades of operating experience across brokerage, IP law, quantitative research, and registry policy. Each author publishes strictly within their area of professional practice — we do not assign coverage outside expertise.

Core Editorial Desk

AV

Alexander Vane

Editor-in-Chief

Two decades in digital asset brokerage and valuation. Formerly advised private funds on domain portfolio construction. Sets editorial direction, owns research methodology, and signs off on all flagship publications.

EV

Elena Vasquez

Policy Analyst

Covers ICANN governance, the New gTLD Program, and regulatory compliance. Tracks application filings, consensus policies, and jurisdictional developments affecting namespace expansion across major markets.

MT

Marcus Thornwell

Senior Broker

Brokered seven-figure transactions across .com, .ai, and category-defining assets. Writes on deal structuring, anchor sales, and private treaty negotiation dynamics at the top of the market.

JR

Jonathan Reeve

IP Counsel

Practicing intellectual property attorney specializing in UDRP and trademark enforcement. Analyzes dispute jurisprudence across WIPO, NAF, and ADNDRC panels and reviews the desk's legal content.

SC

Sarah Chen

Data Strategist

Leads quantitative research: sale-price regression models, renewal economics, and market bifurcation analysis. Maintains the desk's proprietary transaction datasets and valuation tooling.

DO

David Okoye

Market Researcher

Covers registry performance, nTLD adoption curves, and end-user demand signals. Produces quarterly scorecards on registrar and extension economics for institutional subscribers.

CW

Catherine Wells

Portfolio Manager

Advises private holders on liquidation strategy, pricing discipline, and burn-rate optimization across five-figure portfolios. Author of the desk's self-audit and renewal frameworks.

MD

Margaux Delacroix

Contributing Editor, European Markets

Reports on ccTLD regulatory stability, GDPR/WHOIS developments, and cross-border transfer structures from a European market perspective, with a focus on jurisdictional risk.

Advisory Board

RH

R. Hale

Advisor · Registry Economics

Former registry executive. Advises the desk on operator-side economics and extension strategy.

KO

K. Osei

Advisor · Dispute Resolution

Accredited panelist perspective on UDRP practice and forum-selection dynamics.

LT

L. Tanaka

Advisor · Asia-Pacific Markets

Guides coverage of numeric and pinyin liquidity and regional aftermarket behavior.

SB

S. Brandt

Advisor · Corporate Portfolios

In-house brand-protection viewpoint on enterprise domain governance and defense.

Advisory Board members contribute perspective and review on a non-exclusive basis and hold no editorial veto. Their affiliations are disclosed to the desk to manage conflicts of interest.

The Vault

Membership & The Vault Doctrine

The Vault exists because the most valuable market intelligence cannot be published openly. Transaction transcripts, ownership registries, valuation models, and legal toolkits carry confidentiality obligations and competitive sensitivity. Restricting access is what keeps the material candid — and valuable.

The Vault Doctrine

We admit members selectively rather than at scale. This is deliberate: a smaller, professional readership allows contributors to share material they would never place in public, and protects the commercial interests of the professionals whose anonymized activity underpins our datasets. Membership is a privilege extended to practitioners, not a product sold to the widest audience.

All members agree to confidentiality expectations regarding restricted materials. Applications are reviewed by the desk, and admission is granted at our discretion.

Membership Tiers

Analyst
Entry Access
  • All Open Access analysis
  • The Vault Brief weekly newsletter
  • Public sales data summaries
  • Member-only article previews
Subscribe
Institutional
Bespoke Intelligence
  • Everything in Partner
  • Custom research commissions
  • Direct desk access & briefings
  • Portfolio audit services
  • Enhanced confidentiality / NDA
Engage the Desk

Membership applications are reviewed within five business days. The desk reserves the right to decline applications that do not align with the professional character of the Vault.

Correspondence

Contact & Inquiries

All correspondence is reviewed by the editorial desk. Responses are typically issued within two business days. For membership applications, please include a brief note on your professional involvement in the domain market.

Editorialeditorial@mainsearches.com
Membershipmembership@mainsearches.com
Partnerships & Advertisingpartners@mainsearches.com
Press Inquiriespress@mainsearches.com
Correctionscorrections@mainsearches.com
Privacy Requestsprivacy@mainsearches.com

Message Sent Successfully

Your inquiry has been delivered to the editorial desk. Expect a response within two business days.

Close

Membership Capacity Reached

All membership slots are currently filled for this quarter. Our desk reviews applications in limited cohorts to preserve the confidentiality and quality of the Vault. Join the waitlist to be notified when capacity opens.

You've been added to the waitlist. We'll be in touch as soon as a slot becomes available.